Evaluation

School of Architecture & Construction

 

STUDENT FEEDBACK                                                                       SESSION 2010-11

 

COURSE TITLE:                                                                      COURSE CODE:

 

COURSE CO-ORDINATOR: 

 

Dear Student,

Thank you for giving us some constructive feedback which will help us change/improve the course.

Course Aims: (Write here as per approved Course Specification)

 

 

1.      Please state here which programme you are on:………………………………………………

2.      Write here what you think was GOOD about this course:

3.      Write here your thoughts on what COULD BE IMPROVED:

4.      Read the course aims stated above.  

Do you think these aims have been achieved?         Yes              No

5.      If not, please say why here:

Please hand in this feedback sheet as directed by the course team or at the School Office.

*

COURSE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

We want to know your view of the Course you are just completing.  Please indicate which of the following best reflects your response to each of the statements about this course:

(4)          if you strongly agree with the statement

(3)          if you agree with the statement

(2)          if you disagree with the statement

(1)          if you strongly disagree with the statement

(0)          if the statement is not applicable to this Course

Your Programme: (e.g. BSc Computing)………………………………………………………………

Course Title: …………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Course Code: ………………………………………………………………………………………………….

1.        The broad purpose and intended learning outcomes of the course were made clear to me.

4

3

2

1

0

2.        Details of the teaching/learning programmes (lectures etc) were made clear to me.

4

3

2

1

0

3.        The teaching programme, including lectures, was appropriate to help me achieve the intended learning outcomes.

4

3

2

1

0

4.        The teaching, including lectures, was generally of a good standard.

4

3

2

1

0

5.        There were sufficient opportunities for asking questions

4

3

2

1

0

6.        There were sufficient opportunities for group discussion.

4

3

2

1

0

7.        The level of work was intellectually challenging.

4

3

2

1

0

8.        Details of the assessment tasks and the procedures (e.g. submission deadlines) were made clear to me.

4

3

2

1

0

9.        The assessment workload and its level of difficulty were about right.

4

3

2

1

0

10.      The proportion of assessed work done under formal examination conditions was about right.

4

3

2

1

0

11.      The practical/field work was appropriate for the purpose of the course.

4

3

2

1

0

12.      The quality of the teaching accommodation for this course was of a good standard.

4

3

2

1

0

13.      Appropriate library resources and services were available.

4

3

2

1

0

14.      IT facilities and audio-visual/media resources were satisfactory for the demands of this course.

4

3

2

1

0

15.      Laboratory and other specialist facilities needed for the course were satisfactory.

4

3

2

1

0

16.      Taken overall I found this course valuable in terms of my overall educational expectations.

4

3

2

1

0

Please turn over to add any explanations or further comments.  Thank you.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: